THE CHART OF SIX NUMBER 252

On yesterday’s blog, Buddhism and the Four Noble Truths, I mentioned the Buddhist belief that the self lacks permanent reality, and my disagreement with that position. Afterwards, I remembered the entry “self” falls under number 252 in the Chart of Six along with other significant entries. You be the judge, but I think those correlations favor my opinion.

For those who are unfamiliar with the Chart of Six, there is a whole page on my website http://www.ercian.org/ on that topic. Better yet, go to Ercian Testament - Part Three and read chapters 21 “The Number 444, the Key,” and 22 “The Chart of Six,” since together they form part of a story—my special experiences after I wrote my first religious manuscript back in 1985. Should you want to check a listing of entries under different numbers, see Ercian Testament – Part Four, chapter 28, “Selected Chart of Six Entries.”

The Chart of Six {English Alphabet}

A = 6, B = 12, C = 18, D = 24, E = 30, F = 36, G = 42, H = 48,

I = 54, J = 60, K = 66,L = 72, M = 78, N = 84, O = 90, P = 96,

Q = 102, R = 108, S = 114, T = 120, U = 126,V = 132, W = 138,

X = 144, Y = 150, Z = 156.

One calculates the total value for entries by adding the numerical value of each letter. For the entry “self,” we have 114 + 30 + 72 + 36 = 252. Other entries totaling 252 in the Chart are “to be,” “ser” (which is Spanish for “self” or “being”), “the I,” and “I am a ‘me’.”

As anyone can see, these are significant correlations. The self is to be. It is also ser in Spanish, what we may call the “I” in English or I am a “me.” Critics may claim there is a certain amount of manipulation in the wording of the entries. For example, “self” (number 252) is not equal to “I” (number 54). It is only by adding “the” (number 198) that these entries match. Moreover, instead of saying “I am a ‘me’” I could have said, “I am me,” rendering number 246 on the Chart instead of number 252. To an extent, they have a point; but there is no so-called manipulation in “to be.” Besides, it is amazing that we can find any meaningful relations just by adding the articles “the” or “a.”

Is the Chart of Six a connection to an intelligent being or to an intelligent civilization in the world beyond, perhaps our Creator or Creators? What do you think?

To know all the entries that belong under number 252, one would have to calculate the values for all the words in the dictionary, just to pick those summing 252. In chapter 28, I show thirty-five of them, some found at random and some found by searching for significant matches.

Another group of meaningful correlations in number 252 consists of the entries “female,” “lady,” “dames,” “hood,” and “bitch” (the vulgar neighbor-“hood” term for a female). Is this another coincidence? What do you think?

One combination that worries me is that of “Iran” and “war.” Both entries are 252 in the Chart. They worry me because of the current situation in regards to the enrichment of uranium in Iran. Is there a message here? I do not know. One match alone may be accidental; but then I refer to number 444—what is to me the most important of all numbers in the Chart—and I spot another group of entries that could go with those on 252 to create an ominous match. Those 444 entries are “Jesus,” “Lucifer,” “Muhammad,” “nuclear,” “energy,” “weapon.”

For the third and last time, what do you think?

Have a nice day!